Tuesday, August 19, 2014


Look Who Got Filthy Rich…

When he opened Disneyland in 1955, Walt Disney created a totally new kind of business.

While Disneyland was a success, Disney World was a blockbuster. Investors who bought in at the start in 1971 got rich. And I mean really rich! A $10,000 investment is now worth $1,260,000.

Another Florida-based company is now building the next generation of destination-based entertainment. The similarities to the Disney story are striking.

See the story here.

Sitting on a Gold Mine

Thomas Scarlett

Has the stock market shaken off its mid-summer doldrums? After dropping steadily in late July and early August, the market has rebounded nicely and posted a strong opening to the week on Monday. Perhaps the good economic news we've seen in recent weeks has persuaded market players that the bul market is not necessarily over.

If you're in the mood for a somewhat risky stock that could pay off big, you might want to take a look at Luna Gold Corp. (TSX: LGC), a little-known gold mining company headquartered in Vancouver. The firm just concluded an interesting deal which could lead to substantial profits down the road.

Luna is a gold production company engaged in the operation, expansion, and exploration of gold projects, mainly in Brazil. The company has struggled in the last couple of years, but recent activity suggests it might be ripe for a turnaround.

Right now the consensus seems to be that inflation will remain under wraps, as U.S. economic growth is in no danger of overheating and Europe struggles to get back on track. But a hedge against future unpredictability never hurt, and this stock is more of a play on the underlying company than on the price of gold anyway.

Luna Gold has entered into a strategic investment agreement with Sandstorm Gold Ltd. which, upon completion, will make Sandstorm the company's largest shareholder. Both companies will be putting their effort into revitalizing the company's key asset, the Aurizona gold mine.

The Aurizona gold mine reportedly produces around 90,000 ounces of gold per year, and many analysts believe this figure will rise sharply next year. The mine has a substantial resource base that should enable Luna to expand production consistently, especially with new assistance being provided by Sandstorm.

In addition, Sandstorm and Luna have commenced discussions related to the potential modification of the Aurizona gold stream. The focus of the discussions is to explore opportunities that will increase value for both Sandstorm and Luna shareholders with the goal of improving Luna's access to capital, accelerating production and cash flow to both Sandstorm and Luna and leveraging the highly prospective brownfields and greenfields exploration targets.

Sandstorm currently holds a gold stream agreement to purchase 17 percent of the gold produced from the open-pit operations at Aurizona at a per ounce price of $404 (increasing 1 percent annually).

Under the agreement, Sandstorm will purchase a minimum of 19,500,000 of the PlacementShares,for gross proceeds ofapproximately $19.89 million, that, when combined with the 8.5 million shares of Luna already owned by Sandstorm,would result in Sandstorm owning approximately 19.8% of the issued shares of Luna.To the extent Luna sells additional shares in the placement, Sandstorm will also have the right to purchase up to 20% of the additional Placement Shares.

Lucho Baertl, chairman of Luna Gold, commented: "Sandstorm has continued to be a supportive stakeholder, providing capital through its initial investment, debt facilities, capital contributions and now as an equity investor. We welcome Sandstorm's equity investment in Luna, as a strong financial partner, who will continue to work with us to develop the Aurizona gold endowment to its full potential."

Nolan Watson, president and CEO of Sandstorm, added: "Sandstorm is committed to making the Aurizona mine a success for all stakeholders, and we believe our investment is a demonstration of such intent and a sign of our confidence in the future of Luna."

In July, Luna engaged JDS Energy and Mining Inc. ("JDS") to provide operational and technical support to address mining and processing deficiencies at the Aurizona Mine. JDS will provide site management services and work with Luna employees to stabilize and improve operations, including operator training and the implementation of mining and processing best practices. JDS is a contract mining services firm providing engineering, construction, procurement and management solutions internationally.

Luna recently reported announced its financial results for its second quarter and six-month period ending June 30, 2014. Revenue came in at $16.1 million, including sales to Sandstorm. Gold sales and production of 14,262 ounces showed a steady increase. After closing the Sandstorm Gold Ltd. ("Sandstorm") strategic investment in Luna, the company has a cash balance of approximately $35.5 million and 6,700 ounces of finished gold inventory.

The stock, which trades on the Toronto Stock Exchange, is down about 15 percent in recent months due to uncertainties about the company's future. But Luna is sitting on a gold mine (literally!), and is a bargain right now.

Tom Scarlett is an investment analyst at Personal Finance.


The Perfect High-Income Formula?

I'm ready to release a proprietary formula I've spent the last decade perfecting. It's so effective that Warren Buffett uses the principles behind it to compare companies against their peers. And a study by Charles Schwab shows there's a high correlation between one of its core metrics and the ability to continue paying dividends over time. So you can say the foundation of my formula has some impressive company. Payouts from one of the companies it pinpointed span from $2,520 to a massive $17,179. If dividends of that size interest you…

follow this link for the full story.

Kinder Merger: When Less Is Much More

Igor Greenwald

It's a theme we've been harping on for the last year here: investors in master limited partnerships are frequently at risk from conflicts of interest.

For captains of the industry, MLP investors -- also known as limited partners -- are less true partners than a convenient source of capital. Once the convenience wears off...well, it's a jungle out there, and the last place you want to be is between the apex predator and his next meal.

Because if you do end up there, the partnership agreement won't save you and neither will a board of directors that's really there to do the bidding of the MLP sponsor.

The only solution is to own, if possible, the securities in which the decision-makers are invested most heavily. Because there hasn't yet been an MLP deal unfair to insiders.

At MLP Profits, we've applied this reasoning most enthusiastically to Kinder Morgan (NYSE: KMI), naming it a Best Buy in July for the rich incentives KMI reaped from its MLP affiliate Kinder Morgan Energy Partners (NYSE: KMP). Importantly, KMI is where founder and CEO Rich Kinder has invested the bulk of his billions.

Then, late Sunday, came the news that KMI would buy out KMP, as well as KMP proxy Kinder Morgan Management (NYSE: KMR) and another affiliated MLP, El Paso Pipeline Partners (NYSE: EPB), at a premium.

True, the Kinder offer was mostly KMI stock sweetened with a modest dollop of cash. Still, the gains for all the Kinder investors Monday were undeniable, as was the fact that the limited partners in KMP, KMR and KMI saw more of them than KMI shareholders.

Perhaps Rich Kinder has gone soft and forgot where his own bread was buttered. I kid, of course. In fact, while Kinder limited partners have had a good week, Rich Kinder has positioned himself (and, unavoidably, other KMI shareholders) for a much better decade. A lot of long-term value has been shifted to KMI from the partnerships it's buying out.

Impetus for the deal came from the fact that KMP was already turning over nearly half its cash flow to KMI, which had two undesirable consequences. First, it required KMP to earn a return of at least 14% on an investment just to cover KMI's take and its own nearly 7% yield. Also, as a result of heavy equity issuance to finance new investments, per-unit distribution growth at KMP had slowed, turning off enough investors to push up the yield and thereby make its equity financing that much costlier.

The merger announced last week attacks this problem from two directions. First (at least this is the part that Kinder was keen to stress) it takes advantage of the assets on the books of the affiliated MLPs and the stepped up basis made possible by the buyout to claim for the new KMI $20 billion in tax savings from depreciation over the next 14 years.

Under the current setup, most of this basis would have been available to KMP and EPB limited partners to defer taxes on their distributions. Now the benefits will accrue to KMI, serving to dramatically lower its income tax bill.

Using a 6% discount rate (well above what it will cost the merged company to borrow money in the near term) the net present value of these tax savings is somewhere north of $13 billion. A bit more than $7 billion of that is staying with the limited partners of KMP, KMR and EPB, since they will own 55% of the merged company and will benefit from its ability to pay lower income taxes. But the other $6 billion is going to benefit the KMI shareholders prior to the merger. And though some of that will be courtesy of the stepped up basis created in the merger, a lot will come from the MLPs and their limited partners.

140815tesKMItaxsavings
Let's just estimate the present value of the tax savings transferred from the MLP limited partners to current KMI shareholders at more than $4 billion. As it happens, $4 billion is what KMI has offered for its MLPs in cash. It's also paying $40 billion in stock and assuming debt of another $27 billion, but the point is that the cash cost likely doesn't even cover the present value of the transferred tax savings.

And it most certainly doesn't cover the other major benefit of this deal to KMI, which is the serious reduction in the aggregate equity income paid by the Kinder Morgan corporate family as a result of replacing MLP LP units yielding nearly 7% with KMI shares yielding 4.3% currently.

The savings are impressive. KMP, KMR and EPB declared aggregate distributions of $795 million in the most recent quarter. If those units were immediately replaced with KMI shares at the exchange ratios stipulated by the merger, their owners would have been paid $548 million based on the current KMI dividend. That's a savings of $247 million a quarter, or roughly $1 billion a year.

After the 15% dividend increase KMI has promised for next year it would still end up paying the former limited partners $637 million per quarter, or $158 million less than it will send them this month. In fact, the savings are so large that if KMI merely opted to pay its expanded shareholder base next year as much as the entire MLP family will pay shareholders and limited partners this year, it would need to raise its 2015 dividend by 25% rather than the promised 15%.

Now let's look at the long-term cumulative effect of the reduced payouts for KMP and KMR unitholders only. To do that, I've assumed that KMP could have continued increasing its distributions by 5% annually, as it's doing this year, and compared those to the KMI dividends KMP limited partners stand to collect under the stipulated unit exchange ratio and the merged KMI's projected dividend growth rate (15% in 2015 and 10% annually thereafter.) The last column simply multiplies the per-unit shortfall by the 461.7 million KMP and KMR shares currently outstanding and keeps a running total of the cumulative savings likely to be realized by KMI over these years.

140815tesKMIyieldsavings

Now, Kinder Morgan has a similar table in its merger presentation, only it adjusts the hypothetical KMP payout to factor in the $10.77 per KMP unit it has offered in cash.

But we've already established that the cash portion doesn't fully compensate for the tax benefits transferred in the merger, much less the yield shortfall. Nor will the cash payout be enough to cover the tax bill KMP limited partners will face as a result of the combination. Kinder Morgan estimates the average tax bill of its LPs at $12.39 per unit at the Aug. 8 KMI share price of $36.12 and at $16.41 should the share price rice to $44.44 by the deal close expected late this year.

These are tax bills the limited partners could have continued to defer without the buyout, and would have dodged entirely had they passed on the units to their heirs. And while these tax benefits weren't listed on KMP's balance sheet, they are certainly central to the value proposition of any MLP. Now they're gone. Rich Kinder doesn't care about your tax bill. He's hungry.

The insight driving this deal is that investors have been valuing rapid and predictable dividend growth much more highly than a high absolute yield. So instead of an aggregate yield of maybe 6% growing at 6% a year for its affiliates now, the new Kinder Morgan will offer 4.5% growing at 10% annually. And this in turn means the company will save $2.8 billion on reduced payouts over the next seven years, for a net present value of $2.4 billion. Add in similar savings on EPB distributions and net present value tops $3 billion.

Note that these savings are exclusively at the expense of the KMP, KMR and EPB limited partners at the time of the merger. The corresponding benefit will accrue to current KMI shareholders, who not only won't see their payout cut but will in fact receive higher and more secure KMI dividends as a result of the reduction in the payouts to their merger partners.

The updated merger value exchange scoreboard looks like this:

140815tesKMImergerscorecard
The thing about 2022 is, it's a long way off and any benefits that don't start to accrue until then are highly uncertain. But the big tax bill and payout reductions will be felt as soon as the deal closes.

In contrast, current KMI shareholders appear to be paying $4 billion cash for tangible benefits with a net present value of at least $7 billion, and probably meaningfully more than that. Have I mentioned yet that Rich Kinder owns 23% of KMI but only 0.14% of KMP and KMR?

So, to sum up, Kinder Morgan's proposed buyout of its affiliated master limited partnerships provides a number of cheaply purchased advantages for current shareholders. It will lead to faster, more secure dividend growth based on tax offsets and distribution savings secured at the expense of the limited partners in those MLP affiliates.

The added financial flexibility will allow the company to promote a faster dividend growth rate to investors and give it the means to continue investing in costly but potentially lucrative new projects.

This article originally appeared in the MLP Investing Insider column. Never miss an issue. Sign up to receive MLP Investing Insider by email.


Russian Paratroopers Invade the Arctic Circle

Over 50 Russian soldiers landed on a patch of drifting ice in the Arctic Circle a few weeks ago. Putin's government says it was just a training mission. But the truth is far more sinister. Russia was attempting to intimidate Canada (and the world) by showing they're willing to fight for the North Pole. Their latest show of power came on the heels of 350 paratroopers landing on a northern Siberian island to help establish a military base there.

What's so special about a frozen patch of ice at the top of the world? 90 billion barrels of oil and 1,670 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. The North Pole is a virtual treasure trove of energy. The problem for Putin is that Canada has already laid claim to the riches. Here's how you can profit from the biggest land grab since the Louisiana Purchase.

Click here for the lucrative details.

Exploding Marcellus Has More in the Tank

Robert Rapier

In last week's Energy Letter, I discussed the one million barrel per day (bpd) milestone for North Dakota oil production, and provided a refresher on the geology and the players in North Dakota's Williston Basin.

Another energy production milestone was recently announced by the Energy Information Administration (EIA), and it is just as amazing as North Dakota's rise as a major oil producer. In an Aug. 5 report, the EIA noted that natural gas production in the Marcellus Formation has exceeded 15 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d) for the first time. This amounts to nearly 23% of all US natural gas production, and some 40% of all US shale gas production.

140819telmarcellusprod

Marcellus gas production has increased from 2 Bcf/d in 2010 to 15 Bcf/d today, and it is now the largest shale gas producing region in North America. In fact, the current 15 Bcf/d is equivalent to Canada's average rate of production last year, and nearly three times Mexico's.

So this week in honor of another milestone, let's take a tour of the Marcellus.

Marcellus Overview

The Marcellus Shale is a black shale formation found largely underneath Pennsylvania, West Virginia, southern New York, eastern Ohio, and extreme western Maryland. Most Marcellus wells are drilled at a depth of 5,000 to 9,000 feet beneath the surface, and are then turned horizontally up to 10,000 feet. The wells are hydraulically fractured to release (primarily) the natural gas from the shale. Much of the Marcellus production to date has taken place in Pennsylvania, where the thickness of the formation ranges from 20 feet in the northwest of the state to more than 250 feet in the northeast.

140819telmarcellusmap

Just as the Three Forks formation in North Dakota underlies the Bakken, the Utica Shale underlies large parts of the Marcellus, but the Utica also extends further west into Ohio. Above the Marcellus lies the Upper Devonian, and the entire region is part of the Appalachian Basin.

140819telusshalemap

Just to put into perspective what a big deal this shale gas play is (if the explosive growth of Pennsylvania's gas production is insufficient), the EIA estimated in 2009 that Pennsylvania's proved shale gas reserves were 88 billion cubic feet (Bcf), which is equivalent to less than a day and a half of US production. At the end of 2012, the EIA had upped that estimate to 32,681 Bcf, a 371-fold increase. Over that same time span, West Virginia saw its own proved shale gas reserves increased from 14 Bcf to 9,408 Bcf.

Fracking 101

The Marcellus is really ground zero for the controversies surrounding fracking, so let me make a small digression to bring readers up to speed. Hydraulic fracturing, or "fracking" had been around since the late 1940s and has been used for decades to promote higher production rates from oil and gas wells across traditional production regions like Texas and Oklahoma. Fracking has been used to stimulate oil and gas production in more than 1 million wells in the US.

Fracking involves pumping water, chemicals and a proppant down an oil or gas well under high pressure to break open channels (fractures) in the reservoir rock trapping the deposit. Oil and gas do not travel easily through these shale formations, which is why they need to be fractured. The proppant is a granular material designed to hold those channels open, allowing the oil (or natural gas) to flow to the well bore. Some common proppants include sand, ceramics, glass beads -- even walnut shells have been utilized, but sand is by far the most common proppant in use.

While fracking has been around for decades, two developments in recent years are responsible for thrusting the technique into the public eye.

The first is the fairly recent development of combining fracking with another common technique used in the oil and gas industry -- horizontal drilling. Like fracking, horizontal drilling was invented decades ago, and has been widely used in the oil and gas industry since the 1980s. As its name implies, horizontal drilling involves drilling down to an oil or gas deposit and then turning the drill horizontal to the formation to access a greater fraction of the deposit. These horizontal laterals can be up to 10,000 feet in length, and therefore cover a much greater area below ground than a conventional vertical well.

140819telfrackingillust
Source: ProPublica

The second development is that drilling started to push into populated areas unaccustomed to oil and gas development. If fracking was still relegated to the traditional oil and gas producing states, I doubt much of the public would have heard of it. But these populated areas weren't used to having energy development in their backyard, and as it began to happen many people rebelled against this intrusion into their lives. As someone who believes that fracking is generally safe, I can nevertheless understand the desire by locals to keep it out of their neighborhood. Even ExxonMobil CEO Rex Tillerson joined a lawsuit (which he later dropped out of) against a fracking-related development in his neighborhood.

I don't want to get into the a long digression on the evidence regarding the environmental implications here. There is enough material there to fill two or three Energy Letters. I will just say that I believe fracking is generally safe, and concerns over water supplies are mostly overblown. (There is generally more than a mile of rock between fracked zones and water supplies). However, I think there is substantial evidence that reinjecting wastewater from fracking back into the ground is responsible for the enormous increase in earthquakes in my home state of Oklahoma.

Now, back to the Marcellus.

Just Hype?

The shale gas boom has a lot of critics, both from an environmental perspective and from an economic and/or sustainability perspective. One frequent criticism is that shale gas wells deplete rapidly in the first year or so, and therefore more and more wells must be drilled just to make up for what has been depleted. This is absolutely correct, as can be seen in the following graphics from the EIA:

140819telmarcelluslegacy
Source: Marcellus Region Drilling Productivity Report

The graphics clearly show that cumulative legacy production falls rapidly (and for individual wells the decline is even steeper), but to date this has been more than offset by production from new wells. This of course can't go on forever, and when the drilling sites are saturated the region will likely see gas production decline steeply. Most forecasts don't anticipate a decline setting in for at least a few more years, but it's something we will be watching closely here.

Companies in the Marcellus

Space constraints don't allow me to take a deep dive into the Marcellus companies, which are more diverse than the Bakken producers I highlighted last week. Among the major Marcellus producers covered in depth in The Energy Strategist are Cabot Oil and Gas (NYSE: COG), EQT (NYSE: EQT), Range Resources (NYSE: RRC) and Southwestern Energy (NYSE: SWN). However, these companies vary in lot in their production (gas versus liquids) and risk profile. Further, the Marcellus has logistical constraints in some areas for getting the gas to market. This has resulted in significant regional discounts on Marcellus gas at times, but has also created enormous opportunities for pipeline companies and infrastructure providers in the region.

Conclusions

The Marcellus Shale and surrounding Appalachian Basin have a growth story every bit as impressive as that of the Bakken, which I covered in last week's Energy Strategist. The area has become the most important shale gas producing region in the country, despite challenges from environmentalists. In addition, there are logistical challenges that have prevented this gas from reaching some of the lucrative markets of the northeast. We expect more growth from the Marcellus and like a number of companies operating in the area. Join us at The Energy Strategist for in-depth analysis and profitable recommendations of the companies riding the Marcellus boom.

This article originally appeared in the The Energy Letter column. Never miss an issue. Sign up to receive The Energy Letter by email.


The NEW Cyberspace Millionaires

The Internet is about to change your life – again! We're calling it the Next Wave of the Internet. Companies will spend $788 billion in the next four years just on one leg of the wave. It's the next big thing and could make early investors rich.

McKinsey & Co estimate it's a $6.2 trillion wave! We're so excited about the millionaire-making potential that we've created an entire portfolio around the wave. A full explanation of how this wave will change your life – and, more importantly, make you richer, faster than any other tech investment you'll ever see, – is just a

click away.

You are receiving this email at benjamart.ss.stock@blogger.com as part of your subscription to Investing Daily's Stocks To Watch,
published by Investing Daily. To ensure delivery directly to your inbox, please add
postoffice@investingdaily.com to your address book today.

Email Preferences | About Us | Premium Services | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Copyright 2014 Investing Daily. All rights reserved.
Investing Daily, a division of Capitol Information Group, Inc.

7600A Leesburg Pike
West Building, Suite 300
Falls Church, VA 22043-2004
U.S.A.

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to RSS Feed Follow me on Twitter!